Ratings calculations have been redone. They are now based on weighted averages and take into account sitewide voting patterns. You can manually recalculate your rating at any time by either voting for yourself or by power-cycling the switch that determines whether or not your gallery is ratable.
Special thanks to OnWingedFeet for the short course in Statistics 101, a class that coincidentally I never took. A hundred bonus points for you, my friend. Don't forget to visit his gallery, Sailor Mercury Cels at
http://mercury.rubberslug.com.
Oh, but don't blame him if your scores went down.
I added a little bit of a kick to the formula to make sure that no one takes a nasty dive. I spot-checked a few galleries which have the most ratings (30+) and everything seems to be working as advertised. Let me know if it isn't.
I believe the rating system we have now is fair, except for the ability to leave e-mail comments while rating someone (which will be added at some point due to popular demand). A challenge: find an easy way to screw up the voting system. (i.e. - something that can be done in 15 minutes) If you can find one, please post it here.
Feedback* is appreciated as always. Cheers.
---
\\* feedback including "my score is too low" or "ratings are for the impure" are not really as appreciated as constructive feedback. thx. =p\\